Skip to content

test: skip tests with common.skip#11585

Closed
thefourtheye wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
thefourtheye:skip-with-common-skip
Closed

test: skip tests with common.skip#11585
thefourtheye wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
thefourtheye:skip-with-common-skip

Conversation

@thefourtheye

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The common.skip function adds proper message in TAP format to skipped
tests. It is better not to have the message rewritten in the tests.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

test

The `common.skip` function adds proper message in TAP format to skipped
tests. It is better not to have the message rewritten in the tests.
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label Feb 27, 2017

@gibfahn gibfahn left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch!

@hiroppy

hiroppy commented Mar 1, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

jasnell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2017
The `common.skip` function adds proper message in TAP format to skipped
tests. It is better not to have the message rewritten in the tests.

PR-URL: #11585
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <hello@about-hiroppy.com>
@jasnell

jasnell commented Mar 1, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Landed in 5d4273d

@jasnell jasnell closed this Mar 1, 2017
addaleax pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2017
The `common.skip` function adds proper message in TAP format to skipped
tests. It is better not to have the message rewritten in the tests.

PR-URL: #11585
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <hello@about-hiroppy.com>
@evanlucas evanlucas mentioned this pull request Mar 8, 2017
@thefourtheye thefourtheye deleted the skip-with-common-skip branch March 13, 2017 08:44
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2017
The `common.skip` function adds proper message in TAP format to skipped
tests. It is better not to have the message rewritten in the tests.

PR-URL: #11585
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <hello@about-hiroppy.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2017
The `common.skip` function adds proper message in TAP format to skipped
tests. It is better not to have the message rewritten in the tests.

PR-URL: #11585
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <hello@about-hiroppy.com>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Apr 19, 2017
andrew749 pushed a commit to michielbaird/node that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2017
The `common.skip` function adds proper message in TAP format to skipped
tests. It is better not to have the message rewritten in the tests.

PR-URL: nodejs/node#11585
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <hello@about-hiroppy.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

test Issues and PRs related to the tests.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants