[py] Fix mypy type annotation issues in action_builder

[rpallavisharma]

User description

🔗 Related Issues

#15697

💥 What does this PR do?

fixed mypy issues in action builder file

🔧 Implementation Notes

💡 Additional Considerations

🔄 Types of changes

• Cleanup (formatting, renaming)
• Bug fix (backwards compatible)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality and tests!)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

---

PR Type

Other

---

Description

• Fixed mypy type checking issues in action builder

• Added explicit type annotations for class attributes

• Replaced type checking with isinstance() calls

• Reorganized imports for better type hint support

---

Diagram Walkthrough

flowchart LR
  A["Import reorganization"] --> B["Type annotations added"]
  B --> C["isinstance() checks"]
  C --> D["Mypy compliance"]

Loading

File Walkthrough

	Relevant files
Bug fix	action_builder.py Fix mypy type checking issues                                                        py/selenium/webdriver/common/actions/action_builder.py Moved typing imports to end of import section Added explicit type annotations for devices and enc variables Replaced string-based type checking with isinstance() calls Enhanced type safety for mypy compliance +6/-5

---

[qodo-code-review]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

🎫 Ticket compliance analysis 🔶 5678 - Partially compliant Compliant requirements: None Non-compliant requirements: Investigate and resolve "ConnectFailure" with multiple ChromeDriver instances. Ensure subsequent instances do not log connection errors. Requires further human verification: Reproduce the issue across environments and ChromeDriver versions to validate any fix. 1234 - Partially compliant Compliant requirements: None Non-compliant requirements: Ensure click() triggers JS in href for Firefox as per regression report. Requires further human verification: Cross-browser manual test to confirm JS execution on click in Firefox.

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Possible Issue get_device_with compares device objects to a string name; this likely always fails and may change behavior. Verify expected comparison (e.g., comparing device.name or id). Returns: -------- Optional[Union[WheelInput, PointerInput, KeyInput]] : The device with the given name. """ return next(filter(lambda x: x == name, self.devices), None) Behavior Change pointer_inputs/key_inputs now use isinstance checks instead of comparing device.type to interaction constants. Confirm all device classes inherit as expected and that no proxies/mocks rely on .type filtering. def pointer_inputs(self) -> list[PointerInput]: return [device for device in self.devices if isinstance(device, PointerInput)] @property def key_inputs(self) -> list[KeyInput]: return [device for device in self.devices if isinstance(device, KeyInput)] Typing Compatibility Use of built-in generics list[...] requires Python 3.9+. Ensure project supports this or switch to from typing import List for broader compatibility. def pointer_inputs(self) -> list[PointerInput]: return [device for device in self.devices if isinstance(device, PointerInput)] @property def key_inputs(self) -> list[KeyInput]: return [device for device in self.devices if isinstance(device, KeyInput)]

[qodo-code-review]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

Category	Suggestion	Impact
General	Keep type hints consistent Use the already imported classes without repeating them here to keep the union minimal and future-proof. Referencing the concrete imported classes is fine, but avoid string annotations or redundant qualification. py/selenium/webdriver/common/actions/action_builder.py [44] +self.devices: List[Union[PointerInput, KeyInput, WheelInput]] = [mouse, keyboard, wheel] - Apply / Chat Suggestion importance[1-10]: 1 __ Why: This suggestion is correct but offers no improvement, as the existing_code and improved_code are identical; it merely affirms that the current code follows good practice.	Low
Update

[cgoldberg]

You need to move the import line so the linter doesn't fail.

If you can run ./scripts/format.sh it will probably do it for you.

[rpallavisharma]

Ok.
Thanks.
Sorry I forgot that step before raising the pr.

[navin772]

LGTM!

[rpallavisharma]

@cgoldberg / @navin772 , is there anything pending in the PR for merging? Please let me know if its accepted for merge? Thanks.

[navin772]

It is good to go from my side, waiting for Corey to review it once.

[rpallavisharma]

ok thanks @navin772 .

[cgoldberg]

LGTM.. thanks!

[rpallavisharma]

Thanks @cgoldberg .